The opening pages of Puella Magi Madoka Magica suggest a dreary retread of Sailor Moon: Kyubey, a talking cat, appears before Madoka Kaname, a perky yet otherwise unremarkable school girl, and asks her, “Would you like to change destiny?” Our first clue that Puella has something nastier up its be-ribboned sleeve occurs midway through the first chapter, when transfer student Homura Akemi confronts Madoka with a dire, if cryptic, warning: “You should never consider ‘changing yourself’ in any way,” she tells Madoka. “If you choose not to heed my words, those things that you hold dear will all be lost.” Homura then attacks Kyubey, accusing him of using “dirty tactics” to persuade Madoka to make a contract with him.
Though all the trappings of a traditional magical girl manga are in place — the costume changes, the cute familiars, the teamwork — Puella charts a darker, more violent course than other translated examples of the genre. Homura and Madoka operate in a world where magical girls routinely die; though their powers are formidable, magical girls are worked to the point of emotional and physical exhaustion. Moreover, their contracts are signed under duress; Kyubey frequently appeals to girls in desperate circumstances, using their vulnerability as leverage. (In exchange for battling witches, he explains to Madoka, “I fulfill one wish. Any wish you want!”)
In short, Puella manages to have its cake and eat it, too, faithfully adhering to the genre’s conventions while offering an explicit critique of its underlying message of courage and selflessness. The story is the antithesis of a wish-fulfillment fantasy: the powers that Kyubey bestows come with responsibilities that are too difficult for a young, inexperienced person to bear. Throughout the manga, we see examples of magical girls who have become competitive or embittered by their experiences, at risk of becoming witches themselves. We also meet girls who regret the haste with which they made their contracts, as their wishes were fulfilled at the expense of friends and family members.
As sharp as Puella‘s genre critique may be, the artwork is a disappointment. The character designs are faithful to the original anime, but the magical elements look smudgy on the page, the product of too much dark grey screentone. The anime’s surreal fight sequences have lost their visual punch as well. Creatures that looked strange and menacing in color have been defanged, reduced to cute video game monsters floating above the picture plane.
Most of the fight scenes have been compressed into a few pages, further curtailing their impact; we barely have time to register who the opponents are before one of the magical girls has eliminated the threat. As a result, the volume’s climatic scene lacks emotional resonance. Though the characters have repeatedly discussed how dangerous their vocation is, the fight is so fleeting and impressionistic that the stakes seem too low to yield such a devastating outcome.
If the artwork lacks the personality of a Magic Knight Rayearth or Cardcaptor Sakura, however, the actual story is on par with the best translated examples of the magical girl manga. Like the aforementioned CLAMP titles, Puella Magi Madoka Magica treats the magical girl as a character worthy of complexity and genuine interiority; the Puella girls may engage in magical combat, but they’re painfully aware that saving the world can be an ugly business — even if they’re wearing smart costumes.
Review copy provided by Yen Press.
PUELLA MAGI MADOKA MAGICA, VOL. 1 • STORY BY MAGICA QUARTET, ART BY HANOKAGE • YEN PRESS • 144 pp. • RATING: OLDER TEEN (16+)
10 thoughts on “Puella Magi Madoka Magica, Vol. 1”
Curious, have you seen the anime? Did the manga try to reproduce that weird collage feel of the fight scenes that the anime had? Those fights were kept me with the show before i started really enjoying it (took a few eps for me).
Katherine Dacey says:
Hi, Matt! Yes, I did watch a few episodes, and yes, the manga-ka did try to reproduce the look of the fight scenes. They’re much less successful on the page, however, as the images really cry out for color. (The artist just piles on layers of dark screentone, making those scenes look like everything has a thick coating of soot.) The other problem is brevity: the fight scenes are so short in the manga that the trippy-looking familiars don’t make the same impression they do in the anime.
The manga and the novels seem to be lacking a key driver that existed in the anime. Shame too, because it tied the whole thing together in a way that I am not seeing in the novels and don’t expect to see in the manga. The visuals of the witches world in the anime also really stood out, in a way that can’t be captured in words.
They hired Aoki Ume to do the character designs…maybe they should have hired her to draw the manga. Sounds like her style could have helped.
Katherine Dacey says:
On the whole, I think this is a pretty successful adaptation of the anime; a reader doesn’t need to know the source material to follow the storyline and grasp its main points. I agree, however, that the action sequences don’t make enough of an impact in the manga; they just aren’t weird or long or scary enough to fully illustrate the magical girls’ burden.
Another thing to keep in mind is the staff that worked on this consists of some of the people that worked on Lyrical Nanoha another cerbrial take on the Magical Girl genre and the story itsself was orginaly written by Gen Urobuchi of Nitro + who is known for killing off his charcters with out hesitation.
Overall while the Manga may lack some of the visual “gloss” of the Anime as a story it hits the right points and even manges to make certen parts worse than it was in the Anime i.e. what happend to Mami but than again I’ve likend the whole excpernce of that event to being stabbed in the heart to me.
Did you only read the manga? The anime is quite good, and highlights contrasting art styles particularly well
lol, ignore this comment, since it was addressed in LITERALLY THE FIRST REPLY
Katherine Dacey says:
No worries, Adam! After interacting with the first commenter, I revised my review to incorporate what I’d said in my reply to him. I realize that wasn’t a major theme of my review, so it would be easy to miss.
Comments are closed.